- #MAC VS PC VIDEO EDITING PREMIERE FOR FREE#
- #MAC VS PC VIDEO EDITING PREMIERE FOR MAC#
- #MAC VS PC VIDEO EDITING PREMIERE PRO#
- #MAC VS PC VIDEO EDITING PREMIERE FREE#
#MAC VS PC VIDEO EDITING PREMIERE FREE#
If you don't have money to spare for software, free examples like Shotcut and even Apple's own iMovie can be used to create videos for sharing with friends and family.
#MAC VS PC VIDEO EDITING PREMIERE PRO#
A well-loved alternative to Premiere Pro is Final Cut Pro, especially for those who prefer using software developed by Apple and are looking for software backed by years of development.
#MAC VS PC VIDEO EDITING PREMIERE FOR MAC#
There are some fantastic options out there for Mac owners when it comes to video editing. Available for both PC and Mac - allowing you to take advantage of the familiar interface on multiple platforms - you'll find many advanced features and tools found in pricey multi-track editing software.įree at ShotcutOpen source Choosing the right video editor Shotcut is an interesting choice as it's a capable suite for video editing and happens to be completely free and open source.
#MAC VS PC VIDEO EDITING PREMIERE FOR FREE#
The best part is you can try out the software for free and pick up one of the licenses at a later date when you're happy with the available feature set. And given that NVIDIA owns ARM now, there should be some much tighter and more optimised GPU integration in the future, too.Just like Premiere Pro and Final Cut, Lightworks is designed for anyone to create compelling videos on their Mac. It’s very exciting to see what will come in the future from Apple, but with ARM-based Windows finally getting x86 64-Bit emulation Windows might be able to catch up on performance per dollar. I still can’t see myself switching over to Apple just yet. It was interesting to see a real-world comparison like this. Surprisingly, the M1 actually seemed to perform quite well, if you put all the settings sliders down to “Potato”. They also did some stuff with gaming, if that’s your thing. Performing the same edits as Resolve, there was no slowdown at all scrubbing through the timeline and the final render came out at 47 seconds – faster than DaVinci Resolve on either system. What was impressive, and an area where the M1 won by default because it’s not available on the PC, was Final Cut Pro performance. The M1 iMac wasn’t far behind though, at a minute and 4 seconds. The Intel PC managed it in a very speedy 56 seconds. There were some noticeable performance slowdowns with both systems, but neither really performed any worse than the other.įor rendering a 30-second clip containing two 5.9K 24fps 10-bit 4:2:0 files, sampled down to 4K 24fps H.264 was sent to both machines and they were left to render. To put them to the test, though, they threw some 5.9K 24fps, 10-bit 4:2:0 footage from the Panasonic S1H at them with some multitrack picture-in-picture. They didn’t test Premiere Pro, because apparently, they’re not big fans of Premiere Pro. Videomaker Learn video production and editing, camera reviews Forums General Video and Film Discussion PC vs Mac for HD editing This topic contains 1. 1350 PC vs 5000 iMac PRO for Video Editing Premiere & Resolve - Duration: 13:45.
When it comes to video, DaVinci Resolve was the main comparison between the two. PC VS MAC - Which is the best for editing - Duration: 6:44. Obviously, in these first couple of examples, Lightroom is optimised more for Intel-based systems while Capture One’s M1 optimisation is very impressive.
I think this lends itself well to demonstrating how well optimised certain applications are for specific platforms. When it came to Capture One, though, the results were a little closer. It was basically twice as fast (which you’d expect if you’re paying twice as much). But is it? The Windows laptop hammered the M1 desktop in the Lightroom test. The Razer Blade Studio has a crazy RTX Quadro 5000 graphics card, and Nvidia Cuda is BETTER than AMD for Video Editing in Premiere & Resolve, Right Get your. With that massive price difference, it seems a bit of an unfair comparison, really. It’s half the price of Chris’ laptop, at $1,699 and features an 8-core M1, 16GB RAM and a 256GB SSD. Coming in at $3,499 (although it’s currently available for $2,999), it’s not an inexpensive machine, by any stretch of the imagination. Jordan’s 24″ M1 iMac, on the other hand, is significantly less expensive. Chris’ PC in this case is the Gigabyte Aero 15 YB, with an 11th Gen Intel i9 CPU, 32GB RAM and NVIDIA RTX 3080 GPU with 8GB RAM.
0 kommentar(er)
